Quantum dot light emitting diodes (QLEDs) have attracted immense research interest from both academia and industry due to their desirable display properties. The linewidth of the emission from quantum dots (QDs) is significantly narrower than from organic molecules which means that QLEDs can potentially offer displays with higher colour gamut than OLEDs.
QLEDs are also being investigated for use in lighting and high brightness applications such as projection displays, car headlamps and outdoor signage. For these applications, the maximum brightness of QLEDs must be significantly increased.
QLEDs suffer from a problem known as efficiency roll-off. When the brightness of QLEDs is increased past a certain threshold the efficiency starts to drop (roll-off) which limits the maximum brightness that can be practicably achieved. One of the causes of efficiency roll-off is Joule heating. To achieve high brightness a high current density is required which generates a significant amount of heat inside the QLED, raising the device temperature. At high current densities, the temperature inside the QLED can easily reach temperatures in excess of 100°C. This elevated temperature causes’ efficiency roll-off since the photoluminescence quantum yield of the quantum dots decreases with increasing temperature due to the de-bonding of QD surface ligands and the introduction of surface trap states. To achieve high brightness QLEDs thermal management and thermal stability, therefore, need to be improved.
Solving this problem was the goal of Sun et al who recently published an investigation into the thermally induced efficiency roll-off of QLEDs in ACS Nano and reported the highest QLED brightness ever achieved.1 In this research Sun et al. used the FS5 Spectrofluorometer equipped with the SC-80 cryostat module to investigate the temperature behaviour of two quantum dot emitters with different surface ligands.
Figure 1: FS5 Spectrofluorometer equipped with the SC-80 Cryostat Module
QDs are coated in organic surface ligands which passivate the surface of the dot and improve performance. One of the most popular ligands is oleic acid (OA) which is bonded to the surface of the QD through a carboxylic acid group (Figure 2 left). To investigate whether the de-bonding of the surface ligands was responsible for the efficiency roll-off Sun et al. fabricated QDs with OA ligands and DDT ligands which attach to the QD through a stronger sulphur bond (Figure 2 right).
Figure 2: Quantum dots with Oleic Acid surface ligands (left) and DDT ligands (right). Adapted with permission from ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10, 11433-11442. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.1
To check whether using DDT ligands increased the thermal stability of the QDs, Sun et al. used the FS5 to measure temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra of spin-coated QD films. The change in photoluminescence intensity with temperature of the QDs with OA ligands (QD-OA) is shown in Figure 3a. When the QD-OA film is heated to 140°C the photoluminescence intensity is quenched to 34% of its initial value (left panel). Upon cooling QD-OA back to room temperature (right panel) the photoluminescence doesn’t recover. This irreversible quenching suggests that some OA ligands have de-bonded creating permanent trap states on the surface of the QD.
In Figure 3c the same measurement is repeated for QDs with DDT ligands (QD-DDT). The photoluminescence intensity of QD-DDT is also quenched upon heating but to a lesser extent, retaining 70% of its room temperature value. Furthermore, upon cooling a portion of the quenching is reversible and the photoluminescence recovers to 85% of its initial. These results suggest that QDs with DDT ligands are more thermally stable than OA ligands.
Figure 3: Temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra of QDs with OA and DDT ligands. Adapted with permission from ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10, 11433-11442. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.1
To gain a greater understanding of the recombination dynamics inside the QDs, Sun et al. measured the photoluminescence decays of the two QDs using the FS5’s TCSPC lifetime capability (Figure 4). Both QDs exhibit biexponential decays which was attributed to the excitons in the QD recombining through two independent channels: band-to-band recombination and thermally assisted recombination on the surface.
As the temperature is increased in QD-OA, the proportion of band-to-band recombination decreases and the majority of excitons undergo thermally assisted recombination. The photoluminescence lifetime decreases with increasing temperature since the excitons undergo non-radiative recombination through the trap states created on the surface of the QD. In addition, the lifetime does not recover upon cooling back to room temperature, in agreement with the steady-state results in Figure 3.
In QD-DDT the proportion of excitons undergoing thermally assisted recombination also increases with temperature, however, in contrast to QD-OA; the lifetime of the thermally-assisted recombination component actually increases with temperature suggesting that these excitons are not quenched by surface trap states. Furthermore, the photoluminescence lifetime recovers to close to its original value when the sample is cooled, in agreement with the reversibly exhibited in the steady-state spectra.
Figure 4: Temperature-dependent photoluminescence decays of QDs with OA and DDT ligands measured using TCSPC. Reprinted with permission from ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10, 11433-11442. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.1
Together the steady-state and time-resolved results show that DDT ligands have superior thermal stability, and the work by Sun et al. establishes ligand de-bonding as an important source of efficiency roll-off in QLEDs. For more information about this work, read the full text on ACS Nano.
1. Y. Sun, Q. Su, H. Zhang, F. Wang, S. Zhang, and S. Chen, Investigation on Thermally Induced Efficiency Roll-Off: Toward Efficient and Ultrabright Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes ACS Nano 13 11433-11442 (2019)
The research by Sun et al. was carried out using our compact FS5 Spectrofluorometer. For more information about this spectrometer and how it can be customised to meet your research needs please contact us.
If you would like to hear more news and research from Edinburgh Instruments, please join us on social media and sign up to our infrequent eNewsletter via the sign up box below.
